The Hit Man’s Dilemma (lite)
“Don’t take this personal, it’s just business”
My essay is about the tension between the impersonal conditions of
social life and the persons who inevitably carry it out. This
relationship is poorly understood, perhaps never more than now, when the
difference between individual citizens and business corporations
operating on a scale larger than some countries has become obscured. My
starting point is a legendary remark made in a movie by a professional
killer to his victim, “Don’t take this personal, it’s just business.”
But, according to my favorite American dictionary, a “person” is “a
living human being” and what could be more personal than taking his
life? Perhaps the hit man is referring to his own attitude, not to the
effect. Killing people is a matter of routine for him, a “business”. Why
should business be impersonal and, if it is, how can that be reconciled
with the person who practices it?
Ideas are impersonal, human life is not. So, at one level, the issue
is the relative priority to be accorded to life and ideas. Because the
encounter is live and therefore already personal, the hit man has to
warn his victim (and perhaps himself) not to take it so. It would seem
that the personal and the impersonal are hard to separate in practice.
Our language and culture contain the ongoing history of this attempt to
separate social life into two distinct spheres. This is the core of
capitalism’s moral economy; and gangster movies offer a vicarious
opportunity to relive its contradictions.
At the heart of our public culture lies an impenetrable confusion of
people, things and ideas. We no longer know how to act or in what
context of mutual interdependence. The feminists were right to insist
that the personal is political. The political too is often necessarily
personal. But, if we relied on persons alone to make society, we would
be back to feudalism or its modern equivalent, criminal mafias. There
must be impersonal institutions that, at least in principle, work for
everyone, regardless of who they are or who they know. We have never
been more conscious of ourselves as unique personalities; yet the
impersonal engines of society lie far beyond our grasp. What place is
there for the humanity of individual persons in the dehumanized social
frameworks we live by? This is the hit man’s dilemma and it is ours too.
No comments:
Post a Comment